31 March 2023
The market volatility unfolding after the recent events in the U.S. and European banking sectors is raising many questions in the minds of investors as to what they should do with their investments. Our Capital Markets and Strategy Team in the Macroeconomic Strategy Group takes a step back and looks at what has happened over the course of the last few years and how we might frame discussions with those skittish investors.
Interest rates increased after COVID. Approximately three years ago, the global COVID-19 pandemic was born. Since that time, we’ve had entire countries shut down, globally distributed vaccines, restrictions to cross-border travel, and an eventual gradual reopening. In an effort to minimize the economic impact of the shutdowns, governments around the world provided trillions of dollars in support through federal subsidies and low interest rates.
With an excess of money in the system and an imbalance between supply and demand of goods and services, inflation rose globally to levels not seen in decades. Once the various countries reopened and economies were on solid footing, central banks shifted their focus to reducing inflation. Global central banks began to raise interest rates, some more aggressively than others.
A sizeable increase in interest rates, predominantly in North America, has exposed some individuals and companies who may not be able to weather higher costs during a slowing economy. Many of us know at least one person who has felt the stress from rising interest rates, perhaps from an increase in monthly mortgage costs. Companies are no different, and to varying degrees, they’ve also felt the stress of rising interest rates.
Bank failures added to uncertainty. Most recently, market volatility ensued on the signs of trouble in the U.S. and European banking sectors. In the short term, we’re likely to experience more volatility as the market digests the ongoing fallout from regional banks and potential swings in prices in other areas of the market. As the global economy digests the interest rate hikes from last year, we believe U.S. inflation will continue to trend lower (our view is 4% by the end of the year). And should that be the case, central banks such as the U.S. Federal Reserve, are likely getting close to ending their rate hike cycle, if they’re not already there. In fact, headline inflation has started to decline in most emerging market economies in Asia.1 Many central banks in the Asia region have already made a dovish pivot—for example, Thailand and Vietnam.2
Any market volatility tends to cause the same uneasy feeling for investors, and they start to question their investment choices.
It’s not always easy to make wise investment decisions, and this is especially true during uncertain times. When we’re stressed, we tend to make choices more intuitively and are less likely to spend time carefully sifting through all the pros and cons. The trouble is that intuitive snap decisions won’t necessarily help us meet our long-term financial goals.
Daily availability to market commentary and data has likely shortened investors’ timeframes, as we’re more prone to have knee-jerk reactions to short-term events. As humans, we naturally have biases that we must overcome (such as loss aversion, where the pain of losing is psychologically more powerful than the pleasure of gaining).
We can likely all agree that we shouldn’t react to short-term events and make changes to investments that were based on our long-term plans. Our time frame for our long-term goals is likely to change depending on the stages of our lives. And while there are no guarantees, at its core, investing is trying to make decisions to increase your odds of success.
As the chart below illustrates, having a time frame of greater than three years increases those odds. The table shows returns and odds of being positive for four different time frames: 1, 3, 5, and 10 years (Chart 1).
Chart 1: Markets are positive more often than negative
S&P 500 price index (odds of being positive vs. negative) – since 1950
Source: Bloomberg, Manulife Investment Management, Capital Markets Strategy. As of March 31, 2023.
Three main points to note:
Chart 2: Longer time frame leads to less variability in returns
S&P 500 index historical returns based on time frame (since 1950)
Source: Bloomberg, Manulife Investment Management, Capital Markets Strategy. As of March 31, 2023.
The results of the historical data are clear: markets are much more volatile in the short term with big movements to both the upside and downside. But typically, over the medium to long term, the odds are in investors’ favour of both a positive return and one that’s likely to help them reach their financial goals. Perhaps this quote best captures the essence of how we should approach our investments during periods of short-term volatility:
“Investing is like soap: the more you touch it, the smaller it gets.”
1 Manulife Investment Management, Q1 2023 Global Macro Outlook: The year ahead
2 Manulife Investment Management, Assessing the contagion risk from ongoing banking concerns to Asia, 21 March 2023
The Fed starts easing: Potential tailwinds for high-quality US credits
Our analysis shows that US IG credits and preferred securities have historically performed well following US Federal Reserve (Fed) rate cuts. We maintain our favourable view of asset classes that offer unique investment opportunities for fixed-income investors looking for potentially attractive returns.
The Fed’s rate decision: Not so surprising, but what’s the path forward?
We see three important themes worth highlighting now that the Fed’s easing cycle is finally underway.
After elections: What’s next for India?
We analyse the implications of the recent pivotal election and lay out a roadmap for how it may affect India’s economic development and investment opportunities through the ‘5Ds’ framework.